User:Bay manila

bay manila> a lot of filipinos are believing in our criminal justice system,. but, majority of which could not avail of the provision under sec 12 par 1 of art,.3 of the revised constitution of 1987,. i have a lot of experiences, that every person accused of criminal volition is pressumed innocent until proven guilty as charge, as the right under the citing case of miranda vs arizona,.but, notwithstanding the fact,, when and where the counsel steps in when the accused was brought to the nearest community precint for a complaint filed against him,actor,. or when the plea and arraignment,.was schedule in the court of a judge,. is there any possibility that the acostas PAO'S LAWYERS or bailiwick can step in,.or when an accused was brought to the community precint, interrrogated/investigated and then inquest without a counsel,. and then post bail when the complaint was bailable,. less grave offenses,. i am just an ordinary citizen whose knowlegde in law are to little,. can a counsel (public) be there immediately to side for an accused when his right and privileges are assailed republic act no. 7438,. the right of the accused, detain and under custodial investigation.. aside from that when it was investigated, we know that a coferring counsel should guide a person alleged of the crime,? is there any law,.? tasking a counsel to immediately be on the accused/respondent and dependant,.side,.. to invoked his self incrimination,. or contradicting the par 2 of the art 3 sec 12 of the said constitution.