User:Bberumen/Eco-evolutionary Dynamics/Athanasius22 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bberumen


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Bberumen/Eco-evolutionary Dynamics


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section is concise, and it introduces the content effectively. The content is neutral in tone, and the sources are reliable and properly utilized. It is also easy to read and understand. The article is also structured logically as it progesses from the origin of the topic to its examples. Each heading also uses a large number of sources to reinforce the topic. However, feedback, which is the dynamic that is elaborated upon, isn't mentioned in the lead section. Therefore, the article would benefit from clarification in the lead section by including the feedback in the lead and by highlighting its importance. Also, elaborating on an example in the development section could help to balance out the body of the article. The links work for the article.