User:Bcant085/Australian Shepherd/Janemwestcott Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bcant085


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Bcant085/Australian Shepherd


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Australian Shepherd

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content


 * Student added relevant information to the history, which has not yet been included. Student also added information about the appearance of the shepherd's eyes.
 * Information added is up to date and fits in to the rest of the article.

Tone and Balance


 * Content is mostly neutral. Section in "Temperament" seems bias where student says that it is encouraged that the dogs be socialized. In the same section, student also says, "highly recommended" seeming as if there is a preferred perspective.

Organization


 * There are several grammatical mistakes, including commas missing.
 * However, the added sections are clear and flow easily.

Overall Impressions


 * Everything added by the student felt useful and relevant to the article. It felt like the pieces added were missing and helped to fill in previous gaps. Great job!