User:Bcatoto/sandbox

Evaluating content
''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?''

All of the information presented seems relevant to the topic of the article.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

The number of native speakers is from 2008, so it could be considered slightly out of date. Otherwise, all other information seems relatively up-to-date.

What else could be improved?

The article contains all the basic information about the language (phonology, morphology, and syntax), though more in-depth information from each of these fields could be added if the information is available. Also, the section on Palauan numerals could contain a more detailed explanation of their number system.

Evaluating tone
''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?''

All the information is presented directly and in an informative manner without any particular bias.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

There aren't viewpoints that are really over- or underrepresented, though the article could try to detail to what degree the language is used where it is spoken, though that is briefly addressed in the lead.

Evaluating sources
''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?''

All three citations I checked (Blench 2015, Yaoch et al. 1972, and Josephs 1990) are still available and are inline with the information the article gives.

''Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?''

All facts are properly referenced. Sources appear to originate either from grammars, reliable academic papers, or government reports so they are fairly unbiased.

Checking the talk page
What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

Someone in the talk page noted that another article references "Language of Palau", which didn't refer to the article. To solve this, he created the page Language of Palau, which then redirects to Palauan language. Someone else noted that there is no description of the Palauan language's use of katakana despite it being listed as an orthography and the Palauan language being noted in the katakana page.

''How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?''

The article is part of WikiProject Micronesia and WikiProject Languages. It is rated a High-importance for WikiProject Micronesia, and a Mid-importance for WikiProject Languages, and a Start-Class for both.