User:Bchurst/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title Category:Nuclear medicine
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article has lots of content. It simply has a general definition of what the topic is about and then breaks down into the subtopics. It is part of the medicine wikiproject which clearly shows how it needs work.
 * It has a neutral tone and fulfills all of the requirements. the only problem according to the talk page is that it has lots of factual errors within the page which need to be corrected. It appears that there are a few other that have contributed in the past but no one is currently working on the topic.
 * Sources
 * https://medlineplus.gov/nuclearscans.html
 * Sources
 * https://medlineplus.gov/nuclearscans.html

Option 2

 * Article title Radioactive iodine uptake test
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article lacks content other than offering a definition of what the topic actually is. It only has one image and has been ranked as a start on the wiki scale for the quality of the work that has been completed on it. The talk page is empty and it only shows that 1 person has done the entire page. Some of the sources used are questionable and may not have entirely correct information.
 * Sources
 * https://www.uofmhealth.org/health-library/tw9880#:~:text=Results-,A%20radioactive%20iodine%20uptake%20(RAIU)%20test%20uses%20a%20radioactive%20tracer,gland%20problems%2C%20such%20as%20hyperthyroidism.
 * https://www.uofmhealth.org/health-library/tw9880#:~:text=Results-,A%20radioactive%20iodine%20uptake%20(RAIU)%20test%20uses%20a%20radioactive%20tracer,gland%20problems%2C%20such%20as%20hyperthyroidism.

Option 3

 * Article title Radioimmunodetection
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article has been labeled as a stub and only has a simple definition of what exactly it is. other than that it does not contain any information. This was worked on by a single person and lacks any citations or even subpages. All it contains is a lead. It still manages to have a neutral tone and is able to give a clear definition. This article does need a lot of work.


 * Sources
 * https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0969805194900434

Option 4

 * Article title Targeted alpha-particle therapy
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article has been labeled as a start article. This shows that it has basic information on the topic but lacks a lot of key information that a reader might need. One thing that is very well developed about this article is the amount of sources shown to provide proof of factual information. The talk page is empty which shows that this article does not receive much attention and could probably use a good updating.


 * Sources
 * https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6930656/

Option 5

 * Article title Talk:Technetium-99m generator
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is labeled as a start article in which it contains many different subpages that have been started but appear to be a bit empty. The sources for this list seem to be very strong and provide very good proof for the article. This is written in a very neutral tone and can be easily read and understood by the reader. It does lack some pictures but this was already addressed in the talk page.
 * Sources
 * https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/16/024/16024101.pdf
 * https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/16/024/16024101.pdf