User:Bcmcelwee03/1999 İzmit earthquake/Nateherbkersman Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

1999 İzmit earthquake


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bcmcelwee03/1999_İzmit_earthquake?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 1999 İzmit earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Your evaluation of the article was thoughtful and detailed. Your ideas about the implementation of new details, information, photos and maps seems useful for the overall improvement of the article. I like how you were able to notice the run-on sentences that are seen throughout the article. This is important for the general readability and comprehension of the article. All information that was added is useful. I specifically noticed the information you included about the tsunami that occurred after the earthquake. This is definitely important to include as it allows the reader to really visualize the after-effects of the earthquake. Other than that, I'm not sure if the tsunami section and the damages section need to be separate. It seems like most of the damages were cause by the tsunami which was caused by the earthquake, but at the end of the day, as long as all of the information makes it into the edit, I think it will prove to be a substantial improvement.

Response - Alwyn Manalil
Thank you Nateherbkersman. I appreciate the list of the good things we did. I'll look more into what caused most of the damages in this earthquake, whether it was the tsunami or the earthquake itself and see if it's necessary to merge the tsunami and damage section together.