User:Beachlover12/Content editing/Diligent Daisy Peer Review

General info
BeachLover12
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Beachlover12/Content editing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Content editing

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The sources you have added to your sandbox draft will help develop your article further!

Your lead states "Content editing, also known as substantive editing, comprehensive editing, macro editing, or heavy editing." This is a lot. I don't think readers would truly care about the other ways content editing is called.

I don't think "Comprehensive editors are a type of language professional," is really relevant to your article.

Your article could use some pictures in it as well.

I like how your article is not walls of text. It's quick and concise. It gets to the point. Good structure, but could use another topic if you wanted to add one.

Overall, adding pictures will put you in great shape!