User:Beanorton/Reductive stress/JM6353 Peer Review

The content added is relevant to the topic published. It has a neural and informative perspective. The content is suitable for this topic with the proper information given. The sources provided reflects accuracy based on review.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)