User:Beaversquared/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
1901 Auckland City mayoral election

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I selected this article from the C-class articles page from WikiEd. I like New Zealand, and I selected the first one available.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of the article provides a good summary and introduction to the topic (the 1901 Auckland City mayoral election). It does not directly introduce certain aspects of the article.

The content overall is fine. It is relevant and up to date. I think it mentions a few things that could be linked, such as the temperance movement. Again, not bad overall.

The tone and balance is contained and fine. It explains people's perspectives while staying neutral and providing relevant article links for those wanting more information to form their own opinions.

All of the sources seem fine and trustworthy. However, there is a slight lack of diversity in source, but that could be something lost to time.

The images provided give the reader more context about voting in that time period.

There is no talk page.

The article in totally is well written, albeit with a bit of a repetitive nature here and there. I think the topic is rather small, so it may be hard to improve it. I think it just needs more linking and more sources if there are any available.