User:Beba29x/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Architectural theory

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose it because theoretical architecture was the begging of architecture as it is now the history that we look into to find explanation to what we see today. It matters because without history there wouldn't be a theory and then then wouldn't be a solid past to rely on and pass it to the future generation.

Evaluate the article
Lead section is very clear and gives a good brief introductory to the content.

Content: all materials are relatable to the topic and are also kept up-to-date.

Tone: very well expressed and it's clear that the facts are considered from a neutral point of view without expressing any personal opinions.

Sources: Links provided do work and they are reliable to the topic, as well as some of the paragraphs needed some supporting citations.

Organization: Very well organized but needs shorter paragraphs as they makes the reader get distracted when there is so much going on.

Images and Media: Good captions but needs more visual images to give better understanding.

Talk Page discussion: Two paragraphs were off topic but have been edited since then, also some point of views were not demonstrating the topic clearly but they have been edited as well.

Overall Impression: I liked the content as it briefly explained what is important and it had cohesion and hierarchy that simplified the context to the readers. But it could always get improved as there is always room for improvement. ~