User:Bebbly/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Nahuas

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Fairly random exploration from general Wiki page on Latin America>Nahuatl>Nahuas. Interesting because first skim of lead second says this is a significant indigenous group today derivative of the Aztecs.

Evaluate the article
Lead section

- last paragraph doesn't have a citation for an unconfirmed fact "It is suggested"

- doesn't include brief descriptions of all headings

- good intro sentence

- concise

Content

- missing information: section says 1821-present but has little to no information from 1900s forward

- culture is very bare bones

Tone

- seems balanced but my lack of knowledge on any controversies may skew eval

Sources and References

- large paragraphs/parts of paragraphs without any citations

- some citations include page numbers and seems to not be from all the same source

- few links

Organization

- clear organization

- chronological history

- clear writing

Images and Media

- good images

- one is original work from a user

- one is source unknown

Talk Page

- "It's obvious you have no idea what you are talking about" arguments about who is and isn't Nahua including some negative language and personal attacks

- issue with whether an image is a racist representation of Nahua people

- multiple C class projects

- " level-5 vital article in Society"

Overall impression

- clearly incomplete article but has a decent starting point, gives reader a least a definition level understanding of the term

- needs more scholarship cited and more information about culture, current state of Nahuas, resolution of issue on who would count / whether famous Nahuas should be included in article