User:BeeHiatt/Tokyo Auto Salon/Joshjensen308 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Brandon Hyatt
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:BeeHiatt/Tokyo Auto Salon

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes./NA
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes./NA
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes./NA
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?no/NA
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? no

Lead evaluation
I assume they are talking about the first paragraph of the article. I couldn't see the lead in your articles draft but I don't think that what you added would have changed it in a hugely spectacular way, So I am sure you are good.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Content evaluation
The content that you added is pretty good. It seems to be great for explaining the venue and what the reactions were to it.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? NO
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? NO
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? NO

Tone and balance evaluation
you did really well with the tone of the things you added being neutral but still entertaining.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? not all of it.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? the one I saw did.
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Sources and references evaluation
You have one good source, I would like to see a few more put in. or more of that source near all the information. if iyou need to source the same thing after every sentence I think that would be better on wikipedia then just sourcing the beginning and the end. but I am not the wikipedia master so for now just some more sources would be sweet.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? NO
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation
very clear and concise.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? yes
 * Are images well-captioned? yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes

Images and media evaluation
that was a dope pic man.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
overall I think the things you added were great, I just think you could use a few more sources to back up the facts you put in. I like the picture and I like the article though.