User:Beekeepergabi/Galapagos penguin/Branzino05 Peer Review

General info
Glitter25, Peanutbutters11, Beekeepergabi
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Beekeepergabi/Galapagos penguin
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Galapagos penguin

Evaluate the drafted changes
The group is in the early stages of their article so I will be reviewing the original article.

Lead Section: The lead section is very clear and concise with the description and overall background information of the Galapagos Penguin. One thing that could be added is a brief mention of the negative impacts that urbanization and or human interactions have on the penguins as it is mention in part of the conservation section.

Content : The content of the article is relevant to the topic of the article with detailed breakdowns on the different content of Galapagos penguins. The information is up to date with reference articles dated in 2020. There seems to be no equity gaps within the article.

Tone and Balance: The tone of the article is neutral with the sole purpose to inform and educate, with no forms of persuasion to the reader.

Sources and References: Most of the references are current, while some are dated in the early 2000's. The references are relevant to the Main Article with diverse authors and thorough information. All the links to the reference articles are currently working.

Organization: The article is well written and easy to read and understand, there are no grammatical and or spelling errors. The article is well organized with sections that reflect the major talking points

Images and Media: There is good use of images with each section having a picture that is relevant to the section with a brief description of the picture below it. All the pictures used are visually appealing.

Overall Impression: This article is a great article to read about Galapagos penguins, looking forward to learn more about the human impact on the Galapagos Penguins.