User:Beepboop327/Pietro Lombardo/Beepboop327 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Apirriello
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Beepboop327/Pietro Lombardo

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, a new paragraph about his beginnings as a sculptor and architect were added (is that part of the lead?)
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * It is the same as the normal article, but it does introduce who he is in general.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No, I don't really see a distinction between the lead and the body of the article, maybe inserting heading for topics and a table of contents may be helpful in differentiating the lead from the body.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * new photo "Mausoleo ad Antonio Roselli in Sant'Antonio, Padua"
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * it is concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * yes, the second paragraph also includes timelines of his work
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * a table of contents after the lead
 * Headings to help separate different topics of the article
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * no

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * the last paragraph could maybe use more context/be expanded upon or be placed in a different part of the article
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * yes, there is a good amount of sources that are evenly used throughout the article
 * Are the sources current?
 * yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * yes, no
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes it is easy to read and factual
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * In the fifth paragraph, Doge in "Doge Pasquale Malipiero" is spelled wrong
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * some headings and sections may be helpful, like one possibly titled "Lombardo's Works"

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * yes, they give visuals to the information and monuments discussed
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * yes they include the name of the monument and where they are
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * I don't think the creators were credited, some photos I can't seem to find on CC Search for their license
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * yes, it's a lot more complete and expands on different works that Lombardo made
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * very detailed about specific works, includes photos, gives a timeline to Lombardo's works
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Adding heading and dividing up topics