User:Beepboop327/Süleyman the Magnificent's Venetian Helmet/Beepboop327 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? No username, no peer working on this article, so I will be reviewing the actual article itself
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Süleyman the Magnificent's Venetian Helmet

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * N/A
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * yes, it clearly states the purpose of the headpiece being desinged
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * yes, it brings up the use, design, etc
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * It includes prints by Agostino Veneziano and others but these are not mentioned later.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * conscise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * no
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * no

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * yes it is
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * does seem to stress the rivalry between Suleyman and the Holy Roman Emperor, and how this advertised Sultan's claim to world domination
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * lacks in-line citations throughout the entire article, but the ones that are referenced are reliable sources
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * yes they do, many citations as well
 * Are the sources current?
 * some are, some are from the 1980s
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * yes, no
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * no
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * yes they are divided into sections, I feel as though another section for the history/origins of it could be one as well

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * yes, it includes one photo. Lacks photos, maybe more visuals of the different prints could be helpful
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * yes, the photo is in the public domain
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * technically N/A, but the article could use more inline citations and expansion on certain topics
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * the headings and topics are divided well, there is a lot of detail as well
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * maybe a section for the history/origin of the helmet
 * definitely some pictures and prints and the influential people involved would help
 * add inline citations where needed