User:Beetstra/timeline1

Parties:


 * User:86.157.70.95 - London, England, UK
 * User:209.6.238.201 - Watertown, Massachsetts, USA
 * User:Brewcrewer
 * User:Jaakobou
 * User:Nableezy
 * User:Nudve
 * User:Rd232
 * User:Tiamut

Timeline:


 * This part (until 21st of August) still under construction, but the situation started earlier:
 * Before: diff, 15:54, 19 November 2007 (not the first insertion, that is further back)
 * From the 21st of August
 * User:209.6.238.201 starts editing on 21st of August, three edits diff1, 02:47, 21 August 2009, diff2, 03:52, 21 August 2009, diff3, 03:53, 21 August 2009. The total of these three is diff4, 03:53, 21 August 2009
 * User:Jaakobou reverts diff5, 12:55, 21 August 2009
 * User:209.6.238.201 reverts diff6, 02:26, 22 August 2009
 * User:Jaakobou reverts again diff7, 09:26, 22 August 2009
 * User:Jaakobou starts a discussion on the talkpage diff8, 09:28, 22 August 2009, "open to discussion"
 * User:209.6.238.201 reverts diff9, 04:57, 25 August 2009, 13:04, 25 August 2009
 * User:Jaakobou reverts again diff10, 13:04, 25 August 2009
 * User:Jaakobou adds a post to the thread on the talkpage diff11, 13:05, 25 August 2009
 * User:209.6.238.201 does not see reason to discuss diff12, 08:09, 29 August 2009
 * User:209.6.238.201 reverts again diff13, 08:11, 29 August 2009
 * User:Nudve reverts "pending consensus", diff14, 10:12, 29 August 2009
 * User:Nudve also posts on the talkpage diff15, 10:13, 29 August 2009
 * User:209.6.238.201 reverts again diff16, 17:53, 31 August 2009
 * User:209.6.238.201 says "that is not how the project operates" diff17, 17:55, 31 August 2009
 * User:Jaakobou reverts again diff18, 03:05, 1 September 2009
 * User:Jaakobou posts on the talkpage diff19, 03:05, 1 September 2009
 * User:209.6.238.201 posts on User:Tiamut's page, seemingly unrelated discussion diff, 04:50, 4 September 2009
 * User:209.6.238.201 reverts again diff20, 04:54, 4 September 2009
 * User:209.6.238.201 adds a comment to User talk:Tiamut (diff, 04:56, 4 September 2009), noting the article Operation Defensive Shield.
 * User:Brewcrewer reverts diff21, 05:36, 4 September 2009
 * Note, there are now three editors who oppose the addition, attempts to discuss have not been made (perm revid as of 12:15, 1 September 2009), yet it gets first reverted before it gets re-discussed. IMHO, this is a contented addition, and hence should be discussed before performed.  There are discussion posts, but the following diffs still push the info before there is some consensus.
 * Now User:Tiamut comes into the situation, first reverts diff22, 10:52, 4 September 2009.
 * then posts on the talkpage diff23, 10:56, 4 September 2009
 * User:86.157.70.95 (until now unrelated) posts on talkpage diff, 09:59, 6 September 2009, edit summary: "Have you ever been a suicide bomber?"
 * User:Brewcrewer reverts talkpage edit by User:86.157.70.95 diff, 10:17, 6 September 2009
 * User:86.157.70.95 re-inserts talkpage edit diff, 10:20, 6 September 2009, edit summary "No, I have not been a suicide bomber and I don't have any other conflict of interest either. Do Jaakobou or Ynhockey have conflicts of interest?"
 * User:86.157.70.95 expands post on talkpage diff, 10:27, 6 September 2009
 * User:Brewcrewer reverts talkpage edit diff, 10:35, 6 September 2009
 * User:86.157.70.95 re-inserts, diff, 10:45, 6 September 2009, edit summary: "Another editor tells me it is wrong to ask this question of these editors and accuses me of vandalism - guidance please."
 * User:Jaakobou reverts diff24, 15:11, 6 September 2009, noting what I mention in my comment just above, WP:BRD
 * User:Tiamut posts on the talkpage (diff, 15:30, 6 September 2009), "Jaakobou has now reverted the material, without discussing, once again", further discussion there follows.
 * User:Rd232 makes a whole set of edits.
 * User:209.6.238.201 re-introduces the information, diff25, 06:54, 7 September 2009, some copy-editing afterwards
 * User:Tiamut does more copy-editing
 * User:Jaakobou explains edits on talkpage (diff, 14:35, 7 September 2009, diff,14:40, 7 September 2009, diff, 14:47, 7 September 2009, diff, 14:48, 7 September 2009)
 * Further discussion follows, not really reaching consensus about what needs to be included].
 * User:Brewcrewer reverts again diff26, 02:42, 9 September 2009, will discuss on talk
 * User:Nableezy reverts diff27, 03:14, 9 September 2009, "try explaining before wiping out productive edits". No, User:Nableezy, that is not how WP:BRD works.
 * User:Jaakobou reverts again diff28, 04:55, 9 September 2009
 * User:Tiamut reverts again diff29, 11:34, 9 September 2009
 * User:Brewcrewer reverts again diff30, 15:21, 9 September 2009
 * Then it becomes difficult, User:Tiamut and User:Jaakobou edit material throughout, bit unclear where it begins and ends, however:
 * User:Nableezy re-inserts the contented data diff31, 22:24, 9 September 2009
 * the info gets copy-edited by User:Tiamut diff32, 00:02, 10 September 2009, refs get added.
 * User:Jaakobou removes/reverts diff33, 18:00, 10 September 2009 and diff34, 18:02, 10 September 2009
 * User:Tiamut reverts diff35, 19:02, 10 September 2009, "in essence undo all of User:Jaakobou's reversion of what I added", yes, sure, but not only you, User:Tiamut
 * Article protected.