User:BellaRoseMo/Ballintubber Abbey/KD455 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

BellaRoseMo


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BellaRoseMo/Ballintubber_Abbey?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ballintubber Abbey

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead is short and to the point without excessive information. I do think that it might be beneficial to add a sentence reviewing the major sections of History and Architecture.

Content

The content is relevant to the article and up-to-date with out any missing content. It does not cover historically underrepresented populations or topics or Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

The content added seems neutral with no heavy bias towards any position or persuasion of opinion. Sources seem to be evenly distributed without a focus on one specific view point.

Sources and References

After checking the four new sources that were added they seem to be reliable and up-to-date. For content reflection and sourcing the article describes the information acurately with sources attached to each piece of information. I do not know if there would be better sources because the sources come from national archives, a published magazine, and the abbey's trust. The links also all work.

Organization

The content does not seem to have any grammatical or spelling errors in it. It is clear and concise by being separated in to sections for History and Architecture of Ballintubber Abbey with subsections on Introduction and Renovations.

Images and Media

The images and media added greatly benefit the overall understanding of the article and contribute in a visually appealing manner. Their captions are short and clear descriptions that do not take away from the overall image and article. As far as I can tell they seem to adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations since nearly all of them are from Wiki Commons.

Overall ImpressionsMy overall impression is that the additions made to the Ballintubber Abbey Wiki Page has greatly improved the article. It is certainly more complete with the addition of renovation information and images, with those being the article's greatest strengths. The only content that I think could be improved is the Lead section with a small summary of the article overall added.