User:Bella LC/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Entomotoxicology
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes the content is relevent to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * It is written neutrally.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Notes
 * Overall, more information needs to be added. Not all toxins are covered and trends are not described properly.
 * The article should also be restructured for better clarity and to make it easier to follow.
 * Poor wording
 * Sources
 * Chophi, Sharma, S., Sharma, S., & Singh, R. (2019). Forensic entomotoxicology: Current concepts, trends and challenges. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 67, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.07.010 
 * Da Silva, Wilhelmi, B., & Villet, M. H. (2017). Forensic entomotoxicology revisited—towards professional standardisation of study designs. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 131(5), 1399–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1603-9 
 * Lots more articles/refernces!!
 * Chophi, Sharma, S., Sharma, S., & Singh, R. (2019). Forensic entomotoxicology: Current concepts, trends and challenges. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 67, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.07.010 
 * Da Silva, Wilhelmi, B., & Villet, M. H. (2017). Forensic entomotoxicology revisited—towards professional standardisation of study designs. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 131(5), 1399–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1603-9 
 * Lots more articles/refernces!!
 * Lots more articles/refernces!!
 * Lots more articles/refernces!!

Option 2

 * Corpse decomposition
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes the content is relevent to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * It is written neutrally.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Notes:
 * Is corpse decomposition an appripriate article title? Should it not be "human decomposition" or "forensic taphonomy" instead?
 * Poor wording, ex: "corpse farm" should be "body farm"
 * Environmental conditions section needs to be lengthened. Not enough information
 * Sources
 * Haglund, & Sorg, M. H. (2001). Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: Method, Theory, and Archaeological Perspectives. Taylor & Francis Group.
 * Pokines, & Symes, S. A. (2014). Manual of forensic taphonomy. Taylor & Francis.
 * Sources
 * Haglund, & Sorg, M. H. (2001). Advances in Forensic Taphonomy: Method, Theory, and Archaeological Perspectives. Taylor & Francis Group.
 * Pokines, & Symes, S. A. (2014). Manual of forensic taphonomy. Taylor & Francis.
 * Pokines, & Symes, S. A. (2014). Manual of forensic taphonomy. Taylor & Francis.
 * Pokines, & Symes, S. A. (2014). Manual of forensic taphonomy. Taylor & Francis.

Option 3

 * Post-mortem interval
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes the content is relevent to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * It is written neutrally.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too
 * Notes:
 * Very short article for a very important area of forensices
 * Doesn't talk about any factos that influence PMI
 * Needs to be lengthened
 * Sources
 * Cockle, & Bell, L. S. (2015). Human decomposition and the reliability of a “Universal” model for post mortem interval estimations. Forensic Science International, 253, 136.e1–136.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.05.018 
 * Madea. (2015). Estimation of the time since death (Third edition.). CRC Press, an imprint of Taylor and Francis.
 * Sources
 * Cockle, & Bell, L. S. (2015). Human decomposition and the reliability of a “Universal” model for post mortem interval estimations. Forensic Science International, 253, 136.e1–136.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.05.018 
 * Madea. (2015). Estimation of the time since death (Third edition.). CRC Press, an imprint of Taylor and Francis.

Option 4

 * Body farm
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes the content is relevent to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * It is written neutrally.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Notes:
 * The general overview of a body farm should be made longer
 * Other than just listing the body farms in the word, a longer description of the activities that go on at one should be described.
 * Sources
 * Other than just listing the body farms in the word, a longer description of the activities that go on at one should be described.
 * Sources
 * Sources

'Byard. (2017). Body farms – characteristics and contributions. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 13(4), 473–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-017-9912-3 '

'Slodden. (2009). Body Farms. In Encyclopedia of Death and the Human Experience (Vol. 1, pp. 111–112).'

Option 5

 * Forensic identification
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes the content is relevent to the topic.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * It is written neutrally.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Notes:
 * Thourough article, but can be strengthened in some places.
 * Article rarely mentions or relates the concept back to the police and it should.
 * Sources
 * Page, Taylor, J., & Blenkin, M. (2011). Forensic Identification Science Evidence Since Daubert: Part I-A Quantitative Analysis of the Exclusion of Forensic Identification Science Evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56(5), 1180–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01777.x 
 * Prahlow. (2010). Forensic Pathology for Police, Death Investigators, Attorneys, and Forensic Scientists. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-404-9 
 * Sources
 * Page, Taylor, J., & Blenkin, M. (2011). Forensic Identification Science Evidence Since Daubert: Part I-A Quantitative Analysis of the Exclusion of Forensic Identification Science Evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56(5), 1180–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01777.x 
 * Prahlow. (2010). Forensic Pathology for Police, Death Investigators, Attorneys, and Forensic Scientists. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-404-9 
 * Prahlow. (2010). Forensic Pathology for Police, Death Investigators, Attorneys, and Forensic Scientists. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-404-9