User:Bellabalde/sandbox

Marta Kaźmierczak. "Intertextuality as Translation Problem: Explicitness, Recognisability and the Case of “Literatures of Smaller Nations”." Russian Journal of Linguistics 23.2 (2019): 362-82. Web. tasiuk, Oleksandr, and Galyna Stroganova. "Meta-Intertext in German Parliamentary Discourse." SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 16.2 (2019): SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2019, Vol.16(2). Web.
 * "Thus intertextuality implies a diologue and connections of a text with another text, other texts or type of texts--which is effected by means of quotations, allusions, by borrowing structure, etc..."(2.1).
 * "Intertextuality covers three types of relations: text-text, text-genre, and text-reality"(2.1).
 * "Referential intertextuality implies the use of fragments of certain texts, while typological intertextuality refers to the use of patterns and structure typical of the text type.

Dewilde, Joke. "Translation and Translingual Remixing: A Young Person Developing as a Writer." International Journal of Bilingualism 23.5 (2019): 942-53. Web.
 * " Once textual borrowings are seen in this light, we are more able to focus on the crutial issues of writing, identity, power, disciplinary dynamics, and discourse that underlie intertextuality"(Translingual remixing as a discursive strategy).

Intertextuality is a literary device that creates an 'interrelationship between texts' and generates related understanding in separate works. Intertextuality is the relation between texts that are inflicted by means of quotations and allusion. Intertextuality, however, is a feature of all writing, as all statements rely on previously written words and phrases repurposed for the current goals of the current text; respond to states of knowledge, opinion, or discussion established through prior texts; or explicitly refer to or evoke prior texts, as originally proposed by V. N Volosinov and M. Bakhtin. The evocation of prior texts may be deeply implicit or may be marked by different levels of explicitness, from cultural familiarity with terms such as "theory of relativity" to authorial identification (e.g., "as Bertrand Russell notes") through formal citation, using one of the standard academic referencing formats.

Intertextuality does not require citing or referencing punctuation (such as quotation marks) and is often mistaken for plagiarism. Intertextuality can be produced in texts using a variety of functions including allusion, quotation and referencing. It has two types: referential and typological intertextuality. Referential intertextuality refers to the use of fragments in texts and the typological intertextuality refers to the use of pattern and structure in typical texts. However, intertextuality is not always intentional and can be utilised inadvertently. As philosopher William Irwin wrote, the term "has come to have almost as many meanings as users, from those faithful to Julia Kristeva's original vision to those who simply use it as a stylish way of talking about allusion and influence"


 * This is the link to the article that I choose to edit: Intertextuality


 * The sentences that are in bold are the sentences that I add, please let me if it flows with the rest of the paragraphs or if it seems out of place.

Review from Amanda L. and Ashley C.
- I think wording is a bit confusing. wording could be more basic to make it more understandable.

-I would expand more on the types of intertexuality to make it easier to follow

- give examples maybe of types.

== Review from Sabrina and Soha: The citations look reliable. Good Job! 👏 The first sentence fits and makes sense. The second sentence has great information, however does not seem like it fits. The facts are on point, but its just like randomly sitting there. I would say find a different spot for it. ==