User:Bellat123/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Georgian mafia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because it seemed interesting and with the first look it seems like a good article, but I wanna delve in a little deeper into the article.

Evaluate the article
Some of the sentences are long and run-on past points where it makes sense. It is good with linking definitions to phrases that someone might not understand by just reading them. It brings up the Sicilian Mafia, which does not seem to be that relevant to the topic. it does a great job at structuring the history and adding subtopics within it. There are some descriptive words that seem to be opinionated, instead of just stating facts. It explains well what they sell. It lacks on dates and specific instances of their certain actions. There are biased words towards Joseph Stalin, but it seems to stay in the middle when talking about information. It does talk about how harsh certain things are. The links in the citations work and there seems to be a decent amount of them. Some of the links seem a little biased against the Georgian mafia, but it is not noted. The websites seem to be varied. Theres no discourse within the talk page, just edits from the writer. There is one asking about a removal of a topic, but it was unanswered.