User:Bencie/Achatinella mustelina/Isaacyag Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Bencie/Achatinella mustelina
 * Link to the current version of the article
 * Link to the current version of the article

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? -It impressed me that she has a lot of information about it
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) -YEs, it only discuss the species that is supposed to be talked about
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? -Yes, it definitely is appropriate
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?-I think it is good the way it is
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) -Yes, the writing and language style is appropriate
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? -No
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?-No
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?-No
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources?-I don't see any resources
 * 13) * I'll add resources and also link them to the little numbers
 * 14) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 15) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?-Everything is good, she just needs to put the resources and of course the little number in each statement or sentence
 * 16) * copy that!
 * 17) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?-It is ready but the resources needs to be in there first
 * 18) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?-Put the resources
 * 19) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?-No