User:Benhansen11/Communication theory/SmokeyJoe77 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Benhansen11


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Benhansen11/Communication_theory?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Communication theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

No additions been made to the lead

Content

-Content and sources are relatively up to date

-Talking about another communication model (the Culture-Based Situation Conflict Model) will be a helpful addition to the article

Tone and Balance

-the tone doesn't seem biased, but it does seem like the sources you are using are the only "correct" information. What I'm saying is to represent more sources with differing views

-phrases like "the success of intercultural communication will not be modelled around..." seem definite. Try saying "some researchers think..." before to imply that this view is not the only correct view

-just make sure to provide plenty of different view points

Sources and References

-Make sure your sources are formatted correctly, using Wikipedia's citation tool to add them correctly as footnotes at the bottom of the page.

-continue to look through and add information from other sources with varied views

Organization

-miscommunication as a business setting is a little confusing to read without any context

-sections make sense, maybe add some notes into where you will add those into the main article

-could add some info to main sections instead of just creating new sections

Images and Media

-no images or media