User:Benne124/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Lifeline of Ohio

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I have chosen to research Organ Donation and Lifeline of Ohio is one of the primary Organ Procurement Organizations in Ohio. My impression is that is needs lots of work. It needs citations, more information, and overall needs to be longer.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article starts off with a clear introductory sentence that introduces what the organization is and what the articles main goal to inform is. The lead section somewhat explains the articles main sections. The lead is mostly precise but does have quite a bit of information. The content of the article is brief but explanatory. The end of the article seems a little biased when it talks about how Life of Ohio promotes and coordinates organ donation. I feel the article is probably trying to persuade the readers to have a good outlook on the organization.

The reference at the bottom of the article leads to an article written by someone that is personally involved in a Columbus hospital. I am not sure this is a great source. You also have to subscribe to view the entire article. The reference is out of date and is not current. Two of the three references go to other pages and work.

The article contains no images or media. There really isn't anything under the talk page.