User:Benohara/I'm Not Scared (novel)/Dharris221 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)- Ben O'Hara
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://docs.google.com/document/d/17c_TeQgnFGHV_MUTftw70R9FtnuqkEIky9NRZLczMTk/edit?ts=5f282b55#heading=h.m168dhm517vc

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?- yes it does
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?- yes it includes a brief statement of what the article is going to be about
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?- no everything is present in the article just in a different form of writing
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?- its concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?- yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?-yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?- from what I read no

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?- yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?- no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?- I feel like the plot doesn't need to as detail as he did it in my opinion
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?- no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?- I asked him was the plot from a source of information or did he come up with it
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?- yes
 * Are the sources current?- yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?- yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?- yes it is to read
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?- just one
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?- yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?- I didn't see any
 * Are images well-captioned?- none
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?- none
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?- none

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?- I asked him about a section other than that yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?- yes
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? yes
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?- not sure

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?- yes In my opinion
 * What are the strengths of the content added?- I couldn't really find any
 * How can the content added be improved?- I feel like the stuff he added was great.