User:Benthicben21/Frenulata/Qian Mateo Peer Review

Lead: The lead has not been updated to reflect new content. There is no separation from the lead to the rest of the wiki article.

Content: The content is relevant to the topic, and discusses "tube worms" Frenulata. Talks about the genus and describes other similar species. The content is up to date.

The first subcategory they have is on the anatomy of the chosen species. They have great information like morphology. Discuss the specific segments of Frenulata. Also discusses some ecological characteristics such as its symbiotic relationship with other bacteria. Also discusses briefly the diet of Frenulata and how the species feeds.

These need to be cited however, there is no reference page so it is hard for me to tell whether this information is up-to-date or relevant. But the morphology descriptions are very well written. Content is written in a neutral voice, professional and scientific. There are no images. Links work. Non-persuasive writing and informative voices.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)