User:Berkeleynicholas/Technology governance/Adamng926 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Berkeleynicholas
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Technology governance

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Not yet, though he has written down a new definition in his sandbox
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No, since there were no sections yet in the original article
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The Lead is concise.

Lead evaluation:
Though the Lead has good content, I would break it up and condense it even more, making the second and third paragraph potentially a section of their own, and add a sentence describing each of the headings that you ended up adding to the article.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No

Content evaluation:
'''Good content that you added! All sources were up-to-date and relevant, though I believe more sources is better (you have 5, but I think 10 is recommended amount).'''

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, though many of the claims put technology governance in a positive light
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Potentially could add more as how technology governance has been harmful in the past
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Tone and balance evaluation:
'''Biggest advice from me would be to potentially add a section on how technology governance has not achieved desired outcomes and behavior, since much of the article paints the topic in a positive light. Having some examples where this was not the case might be beneficial.'''

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes

Sources and references evaluation:
'''Good sources and references! All relevant and good quality, though I would search for more articles and research reports rather than content taken from websites.'''

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes

Organization evaluation:
Great organization!

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Great use of how business technology governance is utilized in our modern lives. Content was very relevant and useful to this article, which does not have nearly enough information without the crucial content that you added.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * I would maybe use some examples of how it has been utilized so far, potentially from research reports since they often are extremely credible and offer good insight. I would also add more sources in general.

Overall evaluation:
Great job with your content!