User:BerryERo/Affective neuroscience/Organizedchaos39 Peer Review

General info
BerryERo
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:BerryERo/Affective neuroscience
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Affective neuroscience

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content: You have added a lot of great content! Your edits provide much needed information to the current article.

Tone: At times, your tone appears to be a bit informal.

Organization: All of your edits are very well organized and the organization makes sense.

Sources: All links to the sources work. I would reccommend adding a few more supporting sources.

Summary: These are some really beneficial edits. It is clear that you put a lot of effort into your research for this topic and made sure to explain each construct.