User:Bes8/Coca-Cola (3)/Avaw13 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Bes8
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Bes8/Coca-Cola (3)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * More or less - the sections that follow are about the artist and origins of painting that relate to the Coca-Cola original painting.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes, new info and further detail is provided.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Yes, direct and to the point.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, and the sections are clear and relevant.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, and the sources of information align.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I think the amount of content is not too long, and gives enough additional information to satisfy readers and further understanding.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes, very informative without bias - gives facts not opinion.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, not that I notice.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I don't think so. Very factual info provided, as mentioned above.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, the sources/references are clearly linked at the bottom.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, within the past 5-10 years.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, all of the links I clicked on work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Not that I came across.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, I think all of the sections are relevant.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes, one image of Andy Warhol the painter.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes, caption is clear.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * To my understanding, yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Somewhat, I think it may be more relevant to have an image of the Coca-Cola painting, but Andy Warhol is also relevant. The placement of the photo could be adjusted next to the section on the artist.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * Yes.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * There are 7 sources from what I can see, providing info on all of the sections in the article.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Yes.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
 * Yes, there are other wiki articles that you can click on from this one.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * More info on the history and origin, which I think are important for understanding how the logo evolved into what it is known to be today. I also didn't know that Andy Warhol was the original artist that painted Coca-Cola.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Perhaps add a bit more info on how the painting has evolved into what we know it to be today. Other than that, I think the new article is clear and the info is written in a neutral point of view.