User:BethC244./The American Eugenics Society/Rav holmes Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) BethC224


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BethC244./The_American_Eugenics_Society?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * No current version exists

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The content add all flows together and is very natural based given this topic does not have a pervious wikipedia page to exist. The lead is very detailed and well- written. All the information seems reliable the only concern is that nothing it referenced or cited so that could be a push back for its accuracy. The section flows together and each paragraph continues the next thought. I believe breaking the section into smaller section sub-headings could be more beneficial for the readers so then they have the chance to see what the main points are that they should take away.