User:Bethakneedeep/Bottom feeder/Avajar20 Peer Review

General info
Bethankneedeep - Bottom feeder peer review

Lead
The introduction looks good but very similar to the original article. Though it is filled with lots of great examples, I think adding descriptions of the other article paragraphs in this section could really help strengthen the introduction! Some more information added to the introduction would be helpful.

Content
You have done a really great job with your additions to the article. The new paragraphs of physiology and behaviour are 2 important things for this article! I think it could be helpful to flush them out a bit more if there is more information available as they are a little short. Your references here are also very well done with your sentences all cited.

Tone and Balance
The tone is neutral, there are no obvious biases in the writing.

Sources and References
I noticed you added citations to the original article where there wasn't any before, great job. Many new references have been added and are all from scientific articles which are good reliable sources.

Organization
The article is very well organized and is clear and concise. Everything is relevant under the proper heading and no paragraph is too bulky to need any subheadings as of yet. Very easy to read.

Overall
Great job on your contribution so far, the article is definitely more complete than it was before. You may want to add another new paragraph or two for some extra information on bottom feeders and fill out the existing paragraphs some more for a really strong article.