User:Beyond My Ken/Acey-deucey

Q. In March-April 2020, ArbCom sent to CheckUser Bbb23 – one of English Wikipedia's best, if not the best CheckUsers – a warning that he was in danger of having his CU activities restricted. As a result of this micro-managing, Bbb23 retired from CheckUser actions for XX timeperiods, reducing the Wikipedia community's protection from sockpuppetry.

As a member of the Arbitration Committee at the time, were you in favor of sending this warning, or not? Why? Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Q. What standard of proof should be utilized when a Wikipedia editor or editors makes complaints about the behavior of a Wikipedia admin or functionary: (1) Where there's smoke, there's fire; (2) Probable cause; {3) A preponderance of the evidence; (4) Clear and convincing evidence; or (5) Beyond a reasonable doubt? On whom should the evidentiary burden fall, the editor making the complaint or the body investigating it, or the admin or functionary against whom the accusation has been made?  Is the accused admin or functionary innocent until proven guilty, as in the Anglo-American system of justice. Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

-Thryduulf +TonyBallioni +GorillaWarfare -Joe Roe ?Mkdw ?/+Bradv ?/+Maxim -DGG -Katie -SoWhy +Xeno

Current AC in general

-desysopped Brown Haired Girl -drove away Bbb23 -sanctioned Doc James -about to open case againt JzG? 3 accepts -seem more interested in being politically correct re "harassment" than in being fair to all parties (per RfC) -hiding behind collective front -refusing to take personal responsibility