User:Bfollowell32/Hydnora africana/Kassy-boi Peer Review

General info

 * User: Bfollowell32
 * Article for review: User:Bfollowell32/Hydnora africana
 * Article being edited: Hydnora africana

Lead

 * The Lead was not changed, but the Lead was already very strong, so I do not believe changing the Lead is necessary.

Content

 * The content is up-to-date on the parasitic plant.
 * Overall, nothing appears to be missing, but there are some parts in the Morphology section that I believe would be better suited in other, already existing sections on the Wikipedia page. For instance, there was a sentence mentioning the smell of the flower, in which Smell is an already existing section on the article, unless you intend on combining the Morphology and Smell section.  Also, do you intend on making the Description its own section, with the Morphology, Smell, Fruit, Reproduction, and Ethnobotany as separate sections? Or are you just adding that Description paragraph right before the other sections?
 * In the Description section, you stated specifically what kind of parasite the plant is, which helped me further my own article, as I have had difficulty deciding what content to add that may be relevant and significant.
 * You added quite a bit of new information on the Morphology, which could help people better identify this plant if they ever encounter it. Also, the Description added interesting information about the plant being an angiosperm.

Tone and Balance

 * All of the content is neutral. Well done!  I often find it difficult to keep what I write completely neutral while still very informative and you provided a lot of content for the article!

Sources and References

 * A few of the sources you cited are from websites that are not necessarily secure, but are up-to-date! I am surprised, but glad, that research is still being done on this particular species.

Organization

 * What you wrote was not difficult to read, which is perfect! You expanded upon already existing sections and possibly created one more section, depending on your goals for the article and the draft.  You do tend to start sentences with the word "the" in the Morphology section, which makes it seem repetitive.  I would recommend formatting the sentences differently so that not all of them start with "the."  Stated before, there are also some bits of information that could be moved to other sections of the article. For example, the sentence in the description that states the plant is merely "roots and flowers" could be moved to the Morphology section.

Overall impressions

 * This edit adds important botany information as well as interesting tidbits on the parasite, which does make the article more complete!
 * I am a little confused on the Description section, since the original article has the Description as a heading with multiple sections below it. You could create a separate section just for classification of the plant, move some descriptions to other sections, or continue to write a paragraph set before the rest of the sections.  Ultimately, any course of action you choose is excellent, I would just like some clarification as to what you plan to do.
 * Reading this article helped me better understand how to format and edit my own article, which I greatly appreciate.
 * The content being added is great on its own, and I have very little to suggest improvement. As stated before, I would recommend re-writing some sentences so not as many begin with "the."