User:Bfull342/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Linus's law.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am a Linux user. That is why I chose this article. My first impression of it was—well—weird.

Evaluate the article
The lead gives the original statement on bug-fixing, but not clear on what it's specifically about in a Wikipedian's own words. Needs a proper explanation.

The content section lacks content. There's only one for the law's validity which doesn't have enough sources I would say.

Sources seem reputable. Citations link back to textbooks and computer science-related news sites. Not sure about that one citation from a primary source however, which is where the original law was written.

The prominent sources used for this article are about the Heartbleed bug from around 2012 to 2014—so more contemporary sources, of more current, critical software vulnerabilities, are likely to be needed here.

The article should be rewritten. Kind of hard to read. What are the "eyeballs" here?

This article lacks an image, but I don't think it should have images due to it being about a theoretical law in computing. Therefore, it's fine.

The biggest discussion in the talk page concerns the title of the article, not the overall quality of the article itself. The second biggest is the difficulty of citing a source for this article.

The article stands currently in the C-Class. It is a part of WikiProject Linux.

The article seriously needs improvement. A strength I could think of it is that it has a foundation for revision. It can be improved by adding more sources and interpreting the existing quotes into one's own words. This article is far from complete.