User:Bholmes8/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Virtual reality game

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose to evaluate this article because I believe that the topic covered in this article relevant to this time period and that it continues to change and evolve. This article matters because it evaluates a topic that we still do not know much about and that continues to improve on the technological side of things. It is also still a fairly new topic that needs to be researched more. My preliminary impressions of this article were that it covers the history and basis of virtual reality gaming well but does not talk about the potential future of VR gaming.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article's lead section was direct and did a good job of explaining the basis of VR gaming. The lead does not include a general outline of the major sections covered in the article but does include the contents of the article. The lead is concise and not overly detailed. Much of the content in the article is relevant to the topic and up to date but could use an update. The article is neutral and does a good job of describing the topic and providing facts backed up by sources. The article's tone is neutral as well and does not attempt to persuade the reader in any way. The sources and references included in this article are reliable and current given the relative newness of the topic. There are not many peer-reviewed sources available on this topic, but the sources are able to be clicked on and viewed. The article does not include many images but the images are helpful in understanding the topic. The images are also well-captioned and adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. There are no conversations going on about this topic. The article is rated as a C article and is listed as being of high importance on the project's importance scale. The article can be improved by adding more up to date sources and improving on the relevancy of the information on the topic.