User:Bholmes8/Lake Nottely/Xiying Huang Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Bholmes8


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bholmes8/Lake_Nottely?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lake Nottely

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content:


 * General Feedback: I think the content you added provides me with basic background information of Lake Nottely. It's pretty concise and informative, but the current version is a bit too broad and you could expand more from what you have now. To continue improve the article, I would recommend you to add several sub-sections to elaborate on the points that you have mentioned. For example, adding "Construction" and "Recreation" sections to enrich your article by covering more relevant details. Also, structuring in this way will help readers navigate your page much easier.


 * Revision suggestion
 * You could consider adding sub-sections in your page to enrich your content.
 * It would be nice to insert links for the reference and add pictures
 * I guess you might forget to customize your title. I don't think you intend to put "article draft" and "article body" out there in your page.


 * Tone and Balance
 * The description maintains unbiased and neutral writing style throughout the article.
 * You are presenting the facts rather than convincing readers to any certain point of view, which is great.


 * Source and Reference
 * From my end, there is no link inserted in your reference section. It might be good to embed the external link so that readers could get access to the sources you have cited.
 * The sources seem to be reliable, but they were all published around 20 years ago. It could be better to contain both old and latest sources in your page.


 * Organization
 * The content is informative for me.
 * My recommendation is to add some sub-sections, refer to the 'revision suggestion' for more details.


 * Image and Media
 * It would be helpful if you could attach the image of reservoir and thus readers could get a better idea of what you are describing.

Summary: Good job! I really enjoy reading your article. All I mentioned above is only my personal opinion, you do not need to change it that way if you don't like it. Otherwise, good luck with your editing :)