User:Bhuggins2/Evolution of the Vitamin D Receptor/Zafallen Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Bhuggins2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Evolution of the vitamin D receptor
 * Evolution of the vitamin D receptor

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Everything written in the article is relevant to the topic. The tone of the article was neutral and the viewpoints were clearly presented. All facts were followed by appropriate citations, references were from credible sources, and links were in working order. References appear to be from unbiased sources. I would suggest adding photographs to the article to give the reader a visual of the vitamin D receptor and hormone. I am not familiar with the vitamin D receptor, so I was a little confused in the lead section when you switch from vitamin D to nuclear receptor. I would add in a sentence stating that relationship for the reader.