User:Bibobeddz/Meherzia Labidi Maïza/Formula23 Peer Review

General info
Bibobeddz
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:[https://learn-eu-central-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com/5dfcd5a07c24c/15852549?X-Blackboard-S3-Bucket=learn-eu-central-1-prod-fleet01-xythos&X-Blackboard-Expiration=1711465200000&X-Blackboard-Signature=hayxzB2qrakpLUVMR05Y3eMkbLIJCNgrG1F5eRM3h3w%3D&X-Blackboard-Client-Id=719533&X-Blackboard-S3-Region=eu-central-1&response-cache-control=private%2C%20max-age%3D21600&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27Annotated%2520wiki.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEIr%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJGMEQCIFkpB6db%2Bg4VQlb%2Fy6r5La4uqYfg%2FciPdH2bv1AQnly7AiBlqG81p3OEIv%2BjJ4YfkDClkG%2BbYLhG2V8uyqX2dHgRkCrGBQij%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F8BEAMaDDYzNTU2NzkyNDE4MyIML0FKCqfJz9jC%2FwxkKpoFfeN0hx%2FAAAxJKiATA1cqNOKgV7VZMJ6Inntpk1%2BzDX7o%2BSI1jXpHquLyYv%2FHDho%2FmIdLUQGDnCuLHBXc24105nsXgXLHXlAiecOTaIaXQcCg6JCPRXZySeHoUrah3FlFaYujzEED1OxVNpdrt5aOK5dDG0wA%2FYG4QgeCMsKEVDPm40n2Nbl9FFMBPZuTiaZ%2FfaEc%2BjUWefBCavxiHh5taxUhYiky67%2B4St5PjasWfT7rsvhFEuIqKVbqmt%2B42zIeXT5yX8xSEnGwJ%2F%2FKy2DCO1XKDoVkMRoVw1qfdBcmbsh%2BP530u5NiuqbzGL5E5URlia9g20OgnDaGwrDjRl2K141yrvQ%2BW9Ief1wZu3r6Q7tNjqiVCUcVHGEqg1xYpPRoPKWQuNH%2B%2F6eVtO%2FW6XwfgoQUiqu1g6uobAZy2FV%2BVjHRb%2FwTDn7Sdglg7uOsFvEtasL1o4SKVPH%2BHL5Aumj9rPdt6B%2BgS9qtEaT2kWtA6qKbqllCbG1j8ubHYYXuOxZd64%2BASfVFPNMzaRZDc%2FB8UEJSmp1bJ9sOkZD6phdTLvg1dbY%2FIkrJTgv4jE3%2Fjf7jZdBUVnH1ILrniYXRaFFj8IPpRAkNbbF1VaHcfqcQOP1EJToc%2B4rHWaI7qvu6UMPpBvzvromgKOeN15QyfgQWpSBfBGFKEiGT27HqBZLibZsMJe%2FMteryDZxQ9fF7bjNo7l7sXjHDBEbXGrgh%2FO6jlfnCxZkgBc5sNbst5vSlT5C1CkBqWubq9BSWLCzqKhtKnJf79GbcMgT8nWmrM5qijXj33ZkIihXLysD2%2BOJFDDKz40F%2BEywx2IGq8%2FkjeROUqXw440rwMvRYzir%2B3rwHEN4nPpfMVvMSr7zNH9HknDhq97e79n4cQZ5dMOKsirAGOrIBB0B7hnOJj4F%2FzMwE%2FJpbHFEKCmrm7FqV8%2FKjekNnlpwXaXTnfwnD54a8KskXUZ61xNB5Yklal1DVYNT0JBMjEayIt1BRg0wtZsF04h%2FKN2ith81V7bMJD%2F6Kq6nHEAybeCQANP%2F13H6KwsvsAhNvqwYuD%2FmmWx73%2BcV83SfWymP%2B0sPEizuhApxP5LQyO9RVXW35oLrxHX3Hd6Q486EwxcSv%2Fviq7tomzZRlRYi68hC8Qg%3D%3D&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20240326T090000Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAZH6WM4PLSCCE4HFV%2F20240326%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=c8a627220035cd35ee1cf2e64bd924218da87584bc10b5b77dc4ed085e751d9d https://learn-eu-central-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com/5dfcd5a07c24c/15852549?X-Blackboard-S3-Bucket=learn-eu-]
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Meherzia Labidi Maïza

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Not yet.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Briefly mention your added sections in the lead.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, gives more examples on Maiza's achievements.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Added content fits and gives more backstory.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * Added content fits and gives more backstory.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Yes, it speaks about Maiza and her efforts to spread equality.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes, speaks on her achievements.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Maiza heavily represented women to gain equality.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, it just gives the story of a person who fought for women's rights.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, it just gives the story of a person who fought for women's rights.
 * No, it just gives the story of a person who fought for women's rights.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, some with multiple sources.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes it is accurately reflected.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Time period of the sources is relevant to the topic. (Around 2021)
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes, editor provides a diverse selection of sources.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Provided sources are reliable and time relevant.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, editor provides a diverse selection of sources.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Provided sources are reliable and time relevant.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Mostly, however, the international engagements section could be made more concise.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

N/A


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, the editor provided more examples of Maiza's achievements and efforts.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Relevant to the Wikipedia page.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * How can the content added be improved?

As I stated if the International engagements section is made more concise.