User:Bigbuddos/Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins/Cmccaid.paul Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead for this article was updated to provide more info on who Emma Hawkins' family was and discuss common themes of her work. The content added is relevant, well-written, and important to the article/topic, such as information about Emma's two novels: Megda (1891) and Four Girls at Cottage City (1895). The content added is divided into sections that reflect the major points of the topic. In other words, the information provided is well-organized. Content reads neutral and factual; there are few biases or opinions stated. I would rework the "As a result" paragraph because it seemed a bit biased. Overall, the article is much more complete than it was before and the quality is high. Great job!