User:Bigbuddos/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it seems very underdeveloped. It matters because, as stated in the article, Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins was a pioneer of African-American women's literature. The public should be more informed about her and her work.

Evaluate the article
The article includes an introductory sentence that introduces the topic. It includes mention of later sections and no sections are included that are not stated in the lead section. The lead section as a whole, however, is far too underdeveloped, only consisting of two sentences. The content of the article is relevant to the topic, but out of date. It consists of no references relevant to the past 10 years and has very little information regarding Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins. Outside of her role as an author, the article makes no mention of any other aspects of her life. The section titled "Works" also has no content outside of two images of her novels. The article is neutral and unbiased. The sources used in the article are reliable but not up-to-date. They are all more than a decade old and one of them does not function. As to whether that reflects the available literature on this topic, further research is warranted. The article is organized and the writing is decent. The images are all relevant and well-captioned. The article is rated stub-class, low importance. The talk page, of which there are only two comments, is dead; the most recent comment having been left over six years ago. Overall, the article is severely underdeveloped and needs work.