User:Bill field pulse/sandbox

Applying Classical Electromagnetic Field theory to quarks.

Quarks where first theorized in 1964 by Murray Gell-Mann. In 1968 they were discovered.

Quarks were a hidden variable at the time when Isaac Newton looked at gravity and even much later when Albert Einstein looked at it. Michael Faraday, and James Clerk Maxwell never had a chance to consider quarks either.

Two important facts:

1) Electromagnetic Fields, a physical change to space, form around charges by moving out at the speed of light uniformly in all radial directions.

2) Quarks are charged particles which cycle within the confines of protons and neutrons moving close to the speed of light. i.e. 0.9 x 3 x10 EE8 m/s in a 0.8 x 10 EE-15 m diameter space.They take about 3 X 10-23 seconds to complete a large circle in this space. (ref comment in video by Murray Gell- Mann

If the above two points are valid then one must reach the unavoidable conclusion that the Electromagnetic Field around neutrons and protons will pulse with high intensity each time a quark cycles in any particular direction.

This implies that the net neutral field around large masses over time would have balanced positive and negative Electromagnetic Field peaks which are undetectable using anything larger or slower than a quark. Just show two charges moving parallel in space, one ahead of the other. The EM field ahead of each charge is compressed; and the field behind each charge is stretched. The leading charge curves outward a purely magnetic effect. The following charge curves INWARD into the thinned field behind the other charge also a purely magnetic effect. Both charges also accelerate apart electrically along the axis between them. I trust this is obvious and not original thought.

In stating Faraday's law and Ampere's law we like to say a changing electric/magnetic field causes a magnetic/electric field respectively however it may be better to say it is not cause and effect but evidence of the same charge behavior

When an EM field is not varying in time, it may be seen as a purely electrical field or a purely magnetic field, or a mixture of both. However, the general case of a static EM field with both electric and magnetic components present can be observed by moving a static charge or moving a magnet. Electric fields are often not measurable when net charges are in neutral balance. Similarly, Magnetic fields are not measurable when charges do not have an aligned net motion. Observers who see (measure) only an electric or magnetic field component of a static EM field, have the other (electric or magnetic) component suppressed, due to the normal cases of immobile net charges that produce or alternatively, the perfect balancing of the electrical charges the EM field in that case. In such cases the other component becomes manifest in other "observer" frames.

One common all magnetic case, is a permanent or electric magnet where most observers "see" only the magnetic component of the field because the electric fields are all in perfect net neutral balance, as measured. Note while no actual charges are static there is no net charge imbalance over very short periods time to show a measurable net electric field. Common all electric cases exists whenever a charged body is present such as, static electricity in your hair. Observers see only the electric field effect because the charge motion is not aligned in a way that would produce a magnetic field.

A consequence of this, is that any case that seems to consist of a "pure" static electric or magnetic field, can be converted to an EM field, with both E and M components present, by moving the observer into a frame of reference which is moving with regard to the frame in which only the "pure" electric or magnetic field appears. That is, a pure static electric field will show the familiar magnetic field associated with a current, in any frame of reference where the charge moves. Likewise, any new motion of a charge in a region that seemed previously to contain only a magnetic field, will show that the space now contains an electric field as well, which will be found to produce an additional Lorentz force upon the moving charge.

In practice, moving an observer fast enough in the same direction a charge is moving to produce a measurable field change is quite difficult.

For example, Moving with the electrons in a long wire to eliminate the magnetic effect of the electrons introduces an equal reverse movement of the protons so that a new magnetic field is introduced. Moving fast, while observing -- and measuring -- even a simple static charge can be extremely difficult requiring a complex experimental set up. Moving with the charge movements in a large permanent magnet, or even an electric one specifically designed for this purpose is impossible, or very difficult.

Thus, electrostatics and magnetostatics are now seen as studies of the static EM field when a particular frame has been selected to suppress the other type of field, and since an EM field with both electric and magnetic will appear in any other frame, these "simpler" effects are merely the observer's. The fact that the two field variations can be reproduced just by changing the motion of the observer is further evidence that there is only a single actual field involved which is simply being observed differently.

Additionally, a group of photons has an alternating electromagnetic property which does not diminish with distance. Each photon will normally disappear upon encountering an electron capable of absorbing that specific whole photon, sometimes in an appropriate receiver designed for the purpose, like our eyes

Note it took many centuries to determine the world was round. Today some say it is obvious. A charge is best seen as a EM field source with a location which defines where the field was generated from at a point in time. The charge only senses the existence of other charges by their field. When one says a hydrogen atom is empty except for 4 tiny charges one ignores that the charges are in constant touch with the other charge's fields. Do you feel a field is rigidly fixed to a charge always there at all distances or does in lag the charge slightly whereby a near light speed charge arrives and the field moves out radially from the instantaneous location. If you see it as a fixed entity without lag how do you explain magnetism?

Consider a large collection of elementary particles mainly electrons (-1), up quarks(+2/3) and down quarks(-1/3). Subject to the following rules: 1) opposite charges attract (because space seeks a neutral field intensity over time and 2) charges sitting unmoving even when balanced neutral are less stable than the same charges spinning negative positive negative positive (space seeks a neutral state over time and 3) space is highly elastic with respect to electromagnetic field intensity able to oscillate positive to negative with the speed of the highest energy photons passing through at the speed of light. 4) Space can hold a field intensity forced upon it by a passing charge or a passing photon.

based upon these rules Certain elements will attract regardless of energy level. composite electron: up quarks(-1/3) will form and so will composite up quark: down quarks(+1/3) both spin due to any off center contact forces. These composites will add spin based upon all interactions with other particle fields thereby increasing particle stability. The two predominant composites with attract to form neutral proto hydrogen atoms also the up-down composite quark will combine with another down quarks to form a proto neutron.

The proto hydrogen atoms and the proto neutrons continue to gather spin with all contacts

In certain rare cases the two neutral proto particles will combine when opposite charges contact closely and spins are matched (synchronous?) Over a very long time spins of the proto neutron and a proto proton within the proto hydrogen atom reach a spin velocity whereby pre chromodynamic bonding occurs and the fields between proto hydrogen protons and proto neutrons begin to reach between particles causing interaction. As the loose groups grow and coordinated quark velocity's become aligned and synchronous full chromodynamic bonding is present and gravitational attraction of neutrons and protons changes the particles into true hydrogen atoms and loose neutrons. As the, mass grows more atoms incorporate neutrons producing hydrogen isotopes.

Let me explain my thinking further. We know the electromagnetic field around a charge is a physical reality. We know that magnetism cause by moving charges is a property of the field. Except for compressing the field forward how else would charge movement alter a field. The field cannot be immediately all around equally or motion would have no effect. This is the physical reality of why moving charges behave differently the compressed field has greater attraction or repulsion than a non compressed one. I know this is may be considered non obvious if one does not believe a single physical field exists.

I would like to see the best mix of good math and good language both as attempts to explain the underlying reality. I like including something like "the the electric field is a part of the physical change to space that occurs due to the presence of a charge. Charges are field creators. When a charge arrives at a point in space time. This field starts at the charge, positive or negative, and moves out from the charges in all directions."

In alternating current the electromagnetic field goes from all magnetic field, to all electric field, to reverse all magnetic field, then to the opposite all electric field before repeating the cycle which repeats 60 times every second. The different electric and magnetic fields are wholly due to, and the cause of, a net charge motion without any direct interaction between the fields. It is always electric field accelerating the net charge and magnetic field produced by the charge motion. Since the electric field causes the charges to move it only indirectly causes the magnetic field to arise. The all magnetic extreme happens when the charges begin to slow but the slowing is not caused by the magnetic field. Instead a net charge imbalance happens to reverse at this point so the charges slow as a reverse electric field begins to grow and not because the magnetic field somehow slows them.

Why is the speed of light a constant while length and time are variable?

Consider an object moving forward in the x direction at velocity v with respect to its initial position at an instant t(0). The dimension of the object in direction x is a result of the combined length of all atoms in direction x. If we look at one atom we know that the x dimension is a result of the average effective electron diameter about the all quark nucleus. The distance between the electrons and the quarks is a function of the EM fields travelling at their normal speed relative to instantaneous position which is the speed of light. No matter how fast the speed of the object becomes the fields giving it a dimension cannot change. As the net object takes up more and more of the velocity available to the field propagation. The atoms must shorten accordingly.

The strong force was developed as a mathematical construct that made it possible for positive and neutral charges to stick together. However, much has changed since it was developed. With the discovery of quarks suddenly there are a mix of positive and negative charges. As well, much smaller distances become possible. Furthermore having near light speed velocity means the existence of relativistic compressed EM field intensity wakes forming behind the quarks movements. Theories about quark movement should pave the way for EM field based forces and gravitons which form as a function of quark movement.

EM Field failure

Electromagnetic Fields inability to explain how electrons attract to protons was a major reason why many physicists moved away from EM theory in favor of Quantum theory to explain atomic structure.

No possible Electromagnetic Field around protons or electrons could possibly ever explain attraction between protons or why the electron was so noncircular in its motion.

Neutrons had no fields because they had no charge.

Obviously much has changed.

Protons are not stationary positive charges they are a stable composite particle made up of near light speed charges 2 positives and 1 negative. Similarly, neutrons are not stationary neutral particles they are composite particles made up of near light speed quarks as well; two negative charges and one positive charge.

Now, it is fairly simple to imagine how at much smaller distances super strong EM fields involving relativistic magnetic effects can begin to hold neutrons and protons together. However, the separate electric and magnetic fields must be abandoned in favor of a single actual field because the mathematical rules of magnetic flux make no sense when the particles move in tiny light speed circles.

Now we can begin to see how the proton and the neutron might produce EM field pulses which explain the electrons’ irregular orbital circular motion.

The motion may explain other effects as well which lead to restoring the EM field to an important place in the world of physics.

Confusion between electromagnetic field and electromagnetic radiation. Today many people use electromagnetic radiation and electromagnetic field interchangeably even though they are entirely different phenomena. It is very hard for me to imagine how this confusion exists. One involves the transfer of energy and can travel huge distances undiminished the other follows coulombs law and looses strength according to one over distance squared. One is continuous and exists around charges in 3 dimensions no matter how the charges move. The other forms only perpendicular to an oscillating charge. One holds the electron to the proton and the reverse. The other is produced when the electron sheds energy suddenly. One applies to all charges and needs to be revisited based upon how quarks move the other is a well studied phenomenon and is entirely due to electrons dropping energy levels.