User:Bindawud03/sandbox

Article evaluation: Pro-Feminism

link Pro-feminism
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Most of the article was relevant other than the section about pornography I don't understand why that is needed in an article about Pro-Feminism.
 * Is the article neutral? The article is neutral in my opinion. Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? I don't see any claims or biased toward a position
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? They over present the viewpoint of anti-pornography feminism. The article should be about pro-feminism the meaning, why it is important, and why people should do it.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? I checked a few citations the article cites the oxford dictonary, the Jounral of women and culture in society, and an article about men's responses to feminism at the turn of the century. Does the source support the claims in the article? The sources that I found support what the editors on wikipedia have written.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? I checked almost every refernece and they all were reliable sources of information. Where does the information come from? The information comes from a list of different sources from womens journals, whiteribbion website, and articles about Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? I noticed that some of the sources cited information from 2007, 2009, and 1987 there are new sources that they could cite. Is anything missing that could be added? I noticed is that the article had a section about anti-pornography feminism but not a section about the opposite of that.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Not really any talking is going on behind the scenes other than the post about taking the article down but it was motioned to be kept.
 * How is the article rated? This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This article is part of the WikiProject Feminism
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? The wikipedia page discusses the topic differently because they only address the male part of pro-feminism not ever mentioning that it could be transwomen also.
 * Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes