User:Biochemlad/Pachymic acid/Smfilosa Peer Review

General info
Biochemlad
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Biochemlad/Pachymic acid
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pachymic acid

Evaluate the drafted changes
The added edits kept a neutral and scientific tone. The edits also added more relevant information to the article and did not feel out of place. The information about pachymic acid being a white powder may be better placed in the first section of the second sentence. The latter part of the sentence (about being poorly absorbed), could have been added at the end of the second sentence. The part about the anti-tumor properties was a good touch and the sentences were structured well.

The sources come from reliable publishers (Spandois Publications) and journal platform (J-Stage). They have also been peer-reviewed and these sources are secondary.

Overall, the edits added to the article made the article better because it expanded the information that was already in the article.