User:Biubiu44/Immediate early genes/Benediktusrayo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Biubiu44


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Biubiu44/Immediate early genes


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Immediate early gene

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Writing errors / typo:

 * Under "Overview" section, of second paragraph, in the context of genetic expression, I think 'promotor' should've been 'promoter'.
 * Additionally, there's a typo on the same paragraph, where 'microRNA' is typed as 'mircroRNA'.
 * Under the 'Function (edit)' section, 'proto-oncogenes' is not typed correctly.
 * On the first sentence of 'Schizophrenia', I believe it's 'dependent' instead of 'depended'.
 * On the last sentence of 'Schizophrenia', "which influence by genetic depend and independent factors" can be written better with "which are influenced by both genetic-dependent and genetic-independent factors."
 * Under "Memory Formation" section's last paragraph, its second sentence has 'utalized' which I believe is a typo to 'utilized'.

Content

 * On the second to last sentence of "Memory Formation", unsure about what memory trace means. Is there a technical definition for that term or is it just a term used for describing how one's memory develops?
 * The content seems to be generally up to date. Papers chosen here are generally published in the last 5 years.
 * There may be some gaps in content, but it is very understandable as the topic of IEG is still in development. The nature of the topic itself is still expanding and a lot of potential applications are still being researched.

Tone and Balance

 * The content presented here (both the previously written content and the content that were updated by author) are objectively informative. Studies that are presented here also seem to be neutral and do not have any agenda behind its content. Author was able to pick good references.

Sources and References

 * The sources included in this article range from the early research of IEG all the way to its recent potential application research.
 * 5 links were randomly chosen and they all directed me to the right publication.

Feedback / General Impression

 * In general, I think that the author has successfully added important information about Immediate Early Genes to the original article. The information added seem to be relevant, trustworthy, and important to let the general public understand more about this underwritten topic.
 * It would be helpful to include a section that specifically state if there's a potential therapeutic application. Thus far, IEG has been associated with some diagnostics application (correlating its phenotype with IEG).
 * Other than psychiatric diseases, are there any other instances where IEG has been shown to significantly be associated with a phenotype?