User:Bkasuio/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Endangered species

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose to evaluate this article because endangered species is an important topic that everyone should develop a deeper understanding on it. It is important that the content is up-to-date and accurate so that people could be beneficial from it. My first impression towards this article is the sufficient information provided from it. It included information like some endangered species in a specific countries, endangered species act, and how to increase the population of endangered species.

Evaluate the article
First of all, the lead included an introductory sentence that clearly describe endangered species. They also include a brief discussion of the article's major sections, such as conservation status, IUCN red list, and endangered species act. The lead is concise, however, the content of endangered species act is somehow over-detailed. Despite that, It includes useful information such as the solutions to endangered species. There is not any content missing, all the essential topics that related to endangered species are mentioned in the article. However, the article might be out of date as the data shown in the article are mostly before 2016. Third, the article is neutral which does not include any personal opinions. It does not intend to persuade any readers to take side. Additionally, all the links work and the sources support the claims in the article. They come from a diverse array of authors and publications, leading to a lower risk of bias. This article is rated as c-class and is part of the wiki project of environment, extinction, zoo, and science policy. Overall, this article is under-developed which can be improved by updating the data and removing some of the irrelevant information from the content of endangered species act. ~