User:Bl.ss.ng/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Evaluate article content by answering the following questions:


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything is relevant to the topic
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Left out bleaching and mental illness like depression, anxiety, low self esteem/confidence that darker skinned women face due to colorism
 * What else could be improved?
 * More pictures

Evaluate the article's tone by answering the following questions:


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Neutral
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * The "Beauty" section is underrepresented

Evaluating the article's sources by answering the following questions:


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links work and yes, they support the claims of the article
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * The information is coming from various articles and books

Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page.

 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * The conversations are very interesting. There was an editor that wanted to add discrimination based on hair color and eye color. (i.e gingerism)
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * start