User:Blackpnk/Amy Díaz-Infante/Blackpnk Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lapraucla


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Amy Díaz-Infante


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Amy Díaz-Infante

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I felt like you incorporated all five elements for a good Wikipedia article.


 * A lead section that is easy to understand
 * You were able to fit all the info within one sentence for the lead section.
 * A clear structure
 * You followed both our class outline and Wikipedia's outline for a good Wikipedia article
 * Balanced coverage
 * No aspect felt like it over took the other. Each section tells a good summary for her and her work.
 * Neutral content
 * I did not feel like it was biased for or against her. It was all neutral and professional throughout the article.
 * Reliable sources
 * I thought you incorporated a range of great sources to pull from. All of your sources were well organized. They all opened to working links and articles. They were all from websites that have some recognition