User:Blainetrain13/Archaeology of Afghanistan/Bobadillag Peer Review

General info

 * Reviewing Blaintrain13
 * User:Blainetrain13/sandbox

Lead evaluation
There is no lead in the sandbox so far, but I think Blaine will add it later on. The lead from the actual article is small and can be worked on to follow intended outline of the idea section in sandbox.

Content evaluation
The content so far is very informative, it gives up-to-date information and is relevant to the article. The sections that were discussed in the previous sandbox is missing, but I know that Blaine will be adding those later on. The sections of what is to be added will work well with the overall article since it is very small and has only one section. I don't think that this article deals with Wikipedia's equity gaps, but I may be wrong.

Tone and balance evaluation
The overall tone of what is written so far is neutral and has no biases. The content also does not persuade the reader to favor sides.

Sources and references evaluation
The first link provided in the draft works and is fairly relevant. For the second source there is no link provided, but upon searching for the article it is recent. Both of the new sources that will be added work with the article and seem to provide enough information for the content(s).

Organization evaluation
From what is in Blaine's sandbox so far it seems organized with the intended plan of the overall article. There are no grammatical errors form what I've read so far. Overall the potential sections of the article stated make sense.

Images and media evaluation
No images or media is used in the draft so far.

Overall impressions
Overall what Blaine has so far and the plan for the article make sense. I know that more information will be added in the future to make the article full and look like an overall article.