User:Blakemurray7/Propaganda/Sarvesh Nyachhyon Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Blakemurray7)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Blakemurray7/Propaganda?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Propaganda

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hi Blake! Here's my peer review for you,

Lead


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - A new lead has been worked on which will add more content to the main article. There is good amount of information set, once more additions and edits are made it should be clear to read.

Article Body


 * Modern Propaganda is supported by wide range of present sources and information which brings current issues and context into life. The tip for this part is that if the sources selected in the article are structured one after the other with some relation or study direction it would flow well for the reader but overall it is looking great.

Content


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes Blake has done a great job of adding the Russian Invasion on Ukraine in the article body which makes the overall article more up to date and credible. As the present context changes the article might need rephrasing or updates in relation to the topic.

Tone and Balance


 * The tone is neutral to the reader, the word selection and connectors are in relation to the sources. It is not one sided which is good for the overall article.

Sources and References


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - The sources are reliable secondary source information, it is credible and up to date. Taylor and Francis Online is the main source page for the article which provides easy to access abstracts and further information for the reader.

Organization


 * There are some words that need to be spelling checked and updated. Apart from the grammatical edits Blake has started the draft well and is in the right direction.