User:Blanca2019/sandbox

Article evaluation

1) Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes, the article relevant to the article topic. There isn't anything that distracts me from the reading but I do wish to have more information in some sections.

2)Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? I believe that the article is neutral because there is a balance between all the positions. One part I believe should be added more is his awards with some explaining of each award.

3)Are there viewpoints that are over-represented, or underrepresented? A viewpoint that is underrepresented is Between Bridges because there is not a lot information about the connections.

4) Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes the links do work and they do support the article.

5)Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Yes the facts do have a appropriate reference. Some of the information comes from newspapers. Which is seems that they are somewhat neutral that as readers we can research more on each source.

6)Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? There are dates that are older but those are important that took part of the Artist’s life.

7)Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? On the talk page one conversation was about the artists been part of the LGBT community .The reason is that there is not a lot of information of him for example it only give some hints about him being gay but not a whole lot.

8)How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Not sure where I can find the rate of this article.This article is part of a WikiProject that wants to know more about the artist.

9)How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Its more in depth in all the areas rather than being basic.~Blanca Sanchez