User:Blathnaid/Sandbox

I've been fixing non-free images tagged with di-no fair use rationale and di-disputed fair use rationale occasionally for the past few months, so I'm gonna note down some observations and thoughts about fixing non-free images that don't comply with WP:NONFREE, before I drink too much on Halloween and forget everything! Bláthnaid 01:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Notifying the image uploader doesn't always work
Especially when the editor is inactive, on a wikibreak, or edits sporadically. How can the uploader have been notified if he isn't around to see the notification?
 * User_talk:Steve_Eifert: The worst case I've come across, particularly this.
 * The notifications on User:Dominicbillings' talk page are similar to Steve Eifert's (though not as large an amount) and are also mostly related to films. However these images were not fixed by the uploader Dominicbillings. User:SkierRMH, who fixes a lot of fair use images, added the fair use rationales and the images were kept. Comparing the two sets of images, it is fair to assume that DominicBillings' uploads would have been deleted without SkierRMH's input. So, it is largely luck whether images uploaded by an inactive editor are kept or deleted, needing the intervention an editor disinterested in the image itself (by this I mean that the editor who fixed the image did not upload it, or have a notification of a proposed deletion pop up on a talk page or article page on his watchlist).

Some more examples. In each case, some of the tagged images that an editor was warned about were kept, but the majority were deleted. I haven't checked who fixed all the kept images, but I assume it was a disinterested editor or an editor who saw the warning on their watchlist, not the image uploader.
 * User talk:Ted Wilkes More than 200 images tagged. Many (most?) deleted. He has not edited since 2006; he was blocked for a year, but has been unblocked since March 2007. A notice on his talk page stating that he had been blocked did not stop the image warnings from being added to his talk page :p
 * User_talk:Dubya_Scott A lot of images tagged in one day.
 * User talk:Cvene64
 * User_talk:Wackymacs A lot of images tagged while he was on a wikibreak.
 * User_talk:Hayfordoleary A lot of images tagged in October, but he stopped editing in August.
 * User_talk:Bleck A lot of images nominated this October, but he stopped editing in August 2005.
 * User_talk:Pn0yvstyle Has not edited since July.
 * User_talk:Viajero Has made only 4 edits in 2007. About 22 fair use rationale messages (also orphan and replaceable fair use messages).
 * User_talk:Spigot Has not edited since May (also orphan messages).

Some editors have their images tagged and deleted in drips and drabs.
 * User talk:KismitCat91 Hasn't edited since January 2005
 * User talk:DynaBlast Retired in April 2006
 * User_talk:Anger22
 * User_talk:Janwillis
 * User talk:Catamorphism
 * User_talk:Rallp30 Has not edited since 2005.
 * User talk:Lfoster12 Hasn't edited since 2006.
 * User_talk:Waltruch Hasn't edited since 2005.
 * User talk:Naturally Hasn't edited since January 2006.
 * User talk:Cedricrichards Hasn't edited since September 2006.
 * User_talk:Johnny_Master Stopped editing this July.
 * User talk:Jan otto Sporadic editor (more orphan warnings than fair use warnings)
 * User_talk:Tryggvia Recent tagging of images, but he hasn't edited since 2006.
 * User talk:Lfoster12 Tagged for lack of sources, not fair use rationales.
 * User talk:Tofts Tagged for lack of sources, not fair use rationales.

An administrator can undelete a deleted image and quickly fix it, eg Image:Sgsaints.png, which was, then restored 5 hours later. How many images that have been deleted could have been fixed just as quickly and easily?

Some examples from 29th October:

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Brady_bunch_movie_poster.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=167769111 Image tagged] that is perfectly fine for use in The Brady Bunch Movie (maybe not for Shelley Long). The uploader hasn't edited since February. No notification was added to the article talk pages.

Compare this with Image:PrefSymbol-Nagano.png (uploaded in 2003) which was quickly fixed by an editor who wasn't the uploader. The uploader, User:Synthetik, has not edited since March 2004. It appears to me that the administrator User:Nihonjoe who fixed the image was alerted to tagging of these types of images by User:ImageRemovalBot taking deleted images out of articles eg. He also restored images that had been previously deleted and taken out of articles eg, ,. It is great that Nihonjoe restored the images and fixed others that were tagged so that the images can remain in the articles that they have been in for years. However, if Nihonjoe had not restored and fixed those images, would they ever have been restored? How many viable images that have been in articles for years have been lost in this way?

Analysis of images deleted on 30th October
On 29th October, I added fair use rationales to a number of images I found in Category:Images with no fair use rationale as of 22 October 2007. I was curious to see what would happen to images remaining in the category that could be fixed to avoid deletion, so I took a note of them. At 00.30 UTC on 30th October, there were 50 images in the category that were now due for deletion. 31 images uploaded before 2007 were deleted. Those images were:
 * Image:Anita_Loos_biography.JPG uploaded 18 October 2006 by
 * Image:Bookcover The ABC of a Russian Nationalist.jpg uploaded 7 December 2004 by
 * Image:DakotaWizards.jpg uploaded 12 April 2006 by {{User|SportsMasterESPN))
 * Image:Gentlemen Prefer Blondes film.jpg uploaded 8 September 2005 by {{User|*drew}}
 * Image:George clinton funk.jpg uploaded 3 December 2004 by {{User|Aika}} This is a replaceable nonfree image, so should have been deleted anyway.
 * Image:Grossmufti-inspecting-ss-recruits.jpg uploaded 12 May 2005 by It was restored by administrator Avraham less than 15 minutes after deletion. (Perhaps he was alerted by the image being taken out of the talk page? Like the Nihonjoe edits above, the restoration of the image occurred only because an administrator interested in the article topic happened to notice the image's deletion.)
 * Image:Iran.ZahraEshraghi.jpg uploaded 28 March 2006 by {{User|Barnetj}}
 * Image:JB recruitment poster Salvation and Vengeance.gif uploaded 24 July 2005 by {{User|Humus sapiens}}
 * Image:Jerusalem Municipality Emblem.jpg uploaded 13 January 2006 by {{User|Monosig}}
 * Image:JerusalemEmblem.jpg uploaded 27 May 2005 by {{User|Humus sapiens}} (Used in Lion of Judah, Jewish symbolism, Lion (heraldry), Cultural depictions of lions
 * Image:Jewish People in the Fight Against Fascism.jpg 8 November 2004 by {{User|Humus sapiens}}
 * Image:Kendall-Jackson.jpg uploaded 19 January 2006 by {{User|Cws125}}
 * Image:Order 66.JPG uploaded 23 December 2006 by {{User|Codenamecuckoo}}
 * Image:Orlova in circus movie 3.jpg uploaded 23 September 2004 by {{User|Humus sapiens}}
 * Image:PFLP-logo.png uploaded 27 April 2006 by {{User|Slarre}}
 * Image:PIJ emblem.png uploaded 26 April 2005 by {{User|Humus sapiens}} Deleted then restored on another editor's request
 * Image:Pravda-otsovruk-c.jpg uploaded 9 June 2004	by {{User|Humus sapiens}} Deleted then restored on another editor's request
 * Image:Protocols Brazil 1937.jpg uploaded 29 September 2006 by {{User|Beit Or}}
 * Image:Protocols of the Elders of Zion 1927 Paris Ru emig.jpg uploaded 25 May 2005	by {{User|Humus sapiens}} (Used in History of the Jews in Russia and the Soviet Union, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Jewish Bolshevism, Timeline of antisemitism)
 * Image:Protocols of the Elders of Zion 1943 Poland Poznan.gif uploaded 25 May 2005	by {{User|Humus sapiens}}
 * Image:Protocols of the Elders of Zion 1992 Russia.jpg uploaded 25 May 2005 by {{User|Humus sapiens}}
 * Image:Protocols of the Elders of Zion 1997 Syria ed by Ajaj Nuwayhid pubd by Mustafa Tlass's PubHse Damascus.jpg uploaded 31 July 2005 by {{User|Humus sapiens}}
 * Image:Protocols of the Elders of Zion and their Biblical and Talmudic Origins 2003 by Ahmad Hijazi al-Saqa prof Comp Religion Al-Azhar U.jpg uploaded 31 July 2005 by {{User|Humus sapiens}}(Used in Jewish exodus from Arab lands, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion)
 * Image:Ramallah-lynch01.jpg uploaded 10 November 2004 by {{User|MathKnight}} (Used in Second Intifada, Lynching in Ramallah Deleted then restored on another editor's request
 * Image:Shalamov mono.jpg uploaded 13 June 2004 by {{User|Humus sapiens}}
 * Image:Sharansky's book Fear No Evil.jpg uploaded 1 February 2005	by {{User|Humus sapiens}}
 * Image:Shweta AB AB.jpg (replaceable) uploaded 14 October 2005 by {{User|Pa7}}
 * Image:Sov-mold-aug-27-1971.jpg uploaded 22 May 2004 by {{User|Humus sapiens (Used in Anti-Zionism, History of the Jews in Russia and the Soviet Union, Zionology, Soviet Union and the Arab-Israeli conflict
 * Image:Tishreen-Apr-30-2000.jpg uploaded 22 May 2004 by {{User|Humus sapiens}} (Used in Antisemitism around the world, Symbolic snake)
 * Image:Tyrant.jpg uploaded 28 July 2005by {{User|Nlight40}}
 * Image:Vienna 1938 pavement scrub.jpg uploaded 19 May 2004	by {{User|IZAK}}

An anonymous editor tagged a lot of images uploaded by {{User|Humus sapiens}} that were deleted. Other images this anonymous editor tagged included 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (used in a featured article), 6, 7, 8. The IP editor did not leave a warning template on either the uploader's talk page or the article talk page, so the only person who could have known that the image was due to be deleted is the uploader who would see the edit to the image on their watchlist. However, since the editor who had uploaded most of the images was on a wikibreak, and other images were uploaded as far back as 2004, it is likely that nobody knew that the image was due to be deleted. Since the IP editor focused their tagging on Jewish-related topics and images uploaded by Humus sapiens, is this some sort of WP:POINT or WP:IDONTLIKEIT tagging? These are historical images that would be hard to replace, and I think it's reasonable to assume that the images I fixed would also have been deleted. 5 images were deleted and removed from a featured article. Does this type of surreptitious tagging and subsequent deletion happen often?

Another problem is that while the most prolific image taggers (User:STBotI and User:BetacommandBot, I think) are sticking to more recently uploaded 2007 images and are giving warning messages to user and article pages, there are cases of other editors like the IP above who are tagging images uploaded years ago and issuing warnings to editors who don't edit anymore, or even no warnings at all. Does it happen often? Are the images caught in time?

Analysis of images deleted on 31st October
These images had been tagged on 23 October Category:Images with no fair use rationale as of 23 October 2007 87 images in the category when I looked at it at 22.00 UTC, 30th October. Skipping over the orphaned images that were deleted:
 * Image:Artcell band logo.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Auteuil Daniel.jpg Uploaded 2006, replaceable fair use
 * Image:Bloodtrails.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Boris logo.gif Fixable
 * Image:CountdownWKONewtitle.jpg Fixable - needed to be resized
 * Image:DWSlogo.jpg Fixable
 * Image:ESC2004.jpg Uploaded in 2005 by an, who has not edited since 2005
 * Image:EfesPilsenSKLogo.png Fixable
 * Image:F3ghy.jpg Uploaded in 2005 by, who has not edited since 2005
 * Image:Flashpoint2.jpg Possibly a replaceable fair use
 * Image:Girl playing Golf Launchpad.jpg Possibly a replaceable fair use
 * Image:Harris.gif Uploaded in 2006 who made <10 edits total
 * Image:ImmersionCorev4PromoImage.png Possible overuse of nonfree images in Star Trek: Bridge Commander
 * Image:Kingoftherocketmen.jpg Fixable - needed to be resized
 * Image:L 28f0fe60176b222894d9f180f5ce456f.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Logo.sesameworkshop.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Lois.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Margaret6x17.jpg Uploaded in 2005
 * Image:Meg griffin.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Megapowers.JPG Uploaded in 2006 by, who hasn't edited since July 2007
 * Image:Melvenus.jpg Uploaded in 2006 by, who hasn't edited since 2006
 * Image:Music-Bell.jpg Possible replaceable fair use
 * Image:NewFoundation.jpg Uploader was not notified that the image had been tagged for deletion
 * Image:Northernd-laying-out-warcraft-map.jpg Uploaded in 2005 by
 * Image:Northernd-warcraft-iii-exp-map.jpg Uploaded in 2005 by
 * Image:Orangelogo.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Photopram.jpg Replacable nonfree image
 * Image:Sellabandlogo.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Siraziev-damir.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Small nhc logo.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Spiegel Titel Page Dec12'1993.jpg Possibly doesn't meet NONFREE
 * Image:Steve Fox (T5 DR).jpg Fixable
 * Image:Stewie griffin.jpg Fixable
 * Image:T2 Jack-2.jpg Overuse of nonfree images in Jack (Tekken)
 * Image:T6 Jack-6.jpg Overuse of nonfree images in Jack (Tekken)
 * Image:Terence young2.jpg Uploaded in 2006 by, who has made <10 edits total
 * Image:The Israel Canaan Dog book cover.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Tina Arena - Burn Single.jpg Overuse of nonfree images
 * Image:Tina-Arena - I want to know what love is single.jpg Overuse of nonfree images
 * Image:True Pulp Murder.jpg Fixable - needed to be resized
 * Image:U2 Tower.jpg Fixable
 * Image:U2tower23.jpg Fixable
 * Image:Ulfat al Adlibi.jpg The delete tag was not removed (possibly a replaceable nonfree image)
 * Image:Unlucky alf.jpg Uploaded in 2006 by, who hasn't edited since January 2007
 * Image:Warhawkcloak.jpg Overuse of nonfree images in Warhawk (PlayStation 3 game)
 * Image:Warhawkfire.jpg Overuse of nonfree images in Warhawk (PlayStation 3 game)
 * Image:Warhawksplit.jpg Overuse of nonfree images in Warhawk (PlayStation 3 game)
 * Image:Warhawktank.jpg Overuse of nonfree images in Warhawk (PlayStation 3 game)
 * Image:Warhawkturret.jpg Overuse of nonfree images in Warhawk (PlayStation 3 game)
 * Image:Yuridia 2007.jpg Replaceable nonfree image

Inconsistency in warnings
A talk page warning isn't always given when an image is tagged for deletion (yes, I realise I've just been complaining about the ineffectiveness of talk page warnings!). Talk page warnings are useful in that they leave a record of who tagged uploads and the reasons why for non-admin editors who don't have access to deleted uploads. And of course it lets editors know what happened to their images if they decide to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Image:Bill-the-fox-foster-1.jpg Uploaded in 2006; the uploader is inactive; no warning on the talk page or article talk. Who is going to fix the image?
 * Image:Khamatova.jpg Uploaded in 2005, inactive uploader, no warning on user talk or article talk 1, 2.

Templated messages warning of a proposed deletion are annoying
I think that part of the problem is that the messages on editors' talk pages warn about possible deletion, which probably puts editors on the defensive and annoys them since it's usually just vandals and idiots who get templated warnings and have their work end up in CAT:SPEEDY. Some examples:
 * User_talk:LordBleen A sporadic editor, annoyed with bot messages.
 * User_talk:RadicalBender Extremely annoyed with bot messages.
 * Funny response to image warning.

Dfu may not be the reason the image is deleted
Dfu may not be the reason the image is deleted, even if that is what the edit summary says. A lot of images that end up in CAT:SPEEDY with a Dfu tag often have other problems (the one I see most commonly is that the image is orphaned). If the only problem the tagged images had was lacking a FUR, then theoretically every single image should be fixed and not deleted. Of course this isn't the case, and editors working through a list of disputed images in order to fix them skip over the images that have other problems. Then the images are deleted, often an edit summary along the lines of "no FUR", but "no FUR" is not actually the reason for deletion. (See 31st October above.)

Solutions?
Always the hard part! Complaining is so much easier.

Fixing images that don't comply with WP:NFCC is tedious and can be stressful. The message from on high however, is that it must be done. Lots of editors are helping out, some tag, some add rationales and sources, some resize, some delete, and some do a little of everything. The amount of images tagged during 2007 must be huge, and it must be tough for the admins who have to decide what to and what not to delete. (I've never seen a day in Category:Images with no fair use rationale with less than 50 tagged, and it can run into the hundreds. And that's just one category on CAT:SPEEDY)

Rationale templates
From the good people here. Would hugely speed the fixing of images.

Task force
Good explanation here.

The lists of disputed images that some editors have created eg eg are good things for a task force to use.

Perhaps some people could look at a category on CAT:SPEEDY (especially if it's large) and catch disputed images that can be fixed? They could then give an admin the OK to go through and the admin could clear the category faster. I think an extra set of eyes is all that is needed sometimes to catch and fix a lot of disputed images.

Uploader help
Perhaps a direct link to Media copyright questions in the di-no fair use rationale and di-disputed fair use rationale templates? Or if there was a template similar to Helpme that an editor could add to their talk page or the image page? Maybe a way for new image uploaders to ask if someone could double-check their uploads before they get tagged by a bot? Or if editors get spammed with lots of warnings (eg) they could put a Helpme on their userpage, and another editor would come along and help them work through the images. Part of the problem I think is that editors might not know that they have done anything wrong until their image ends up in CAT:SPEEDY, and proposed deletion can put people on the defensive even if the problem is easily fixed.